Share |

Newsroom

A Letter to Dennis Ross: Give Voice to America’s Pro-Israel Values

February 24, 2011

Ambassador Dennis Ross
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Ave. NW
Washington DC 20500

Dear Ambassador Ross:

You have devoted your career to helping Israel find peace with her neighbors. In high-level positions in administrations of both parties, you have been a leading presence in the peace process for over two decades. Because you possess such a detailed knowledge of the conflict and the attempts to resolve it, you are capable of distinguishing between truth and falsehood, helpful criticism and destructive activism.

It is thus with some surprise that I learned you would be speaking at this year’s J Street conference. Speaking, that is, before a group that has worked diligently over the past three years to become a voice for weakening the U.S.-Israel alliance, for pressuring Israel to accept policies that Israeli voters have rejected as dangerous, and perhaps most important, for giving Jewish support to a global campaign of delegitimization directed against Israel and Zionism.

J Street has spent much of the last two years opposing sanctions on Iran while demanding that Israel refuse to consider military self-defense; it has partnered with leaders of the Boycott, Divest, and Sanctions movement; its inability to draw distinctions between Hamas and the IDF during the Gaza War was so striking that the president of the Union for Reform Judaism called the group “morally deficient” and “appallingly naïve.” And, more recently, the group was exposed as having dissembled for years about its sources of funding (much of it foreign) and about its support for the Goldstone Report. Rep. Gary Ackerman recently ended his relationship with the group in exasperation, writing that J Street is “so open-minded about what constitutes support for Israel that its brains have fallen out.”

The conference at which you will be speaking is titled “Giving Voice to Our Values.” J Street’s values are most clearly articulated by the speakers it has selected for its conference. These include:

  • Maen Areikat of the PLO, who denies there was a Jewish Temple in Jerusalem and accuses Israel of “state terrorism.”
  • Mustafa Barghouti, a Palestinian leader who said that Israel has “a full-fledged Apartheid system” that is “much worse than what prevailed in South Africa,” and that Israel has been “ethnically cleansing” Palestinians since 1948.
  • Nadia Bilbassy-Charters, a correspondent for MBC TV, who says that Hamas should not be “lumped in” with other terrorist groups because “once Palestine is liberated then [Hamas] will cease to use violence.”
  • Edina Lekovic, of the Muslim Public Affairs Council, who was a managing editor of a magazine that praised Osama bin Laden as a “freedom fighter.”
  • Imam Feisal Rauf, the Ground Zero Mosque leader, who refuses to call Hamas and Hezbollah terrorist groups.
  • James Zogby, president of the Arab-American Institute, who has compared Israelis to Nazis and accused the IDF of “genocide” and a “Holocaust.” Only three months ago he wrote that “In a real sense, the plight of the Palestinians is to the Arabs, what the Holocaust is to Jews worldwide.”
  • Lawrence Wilkerson, a former State Department official, who has repeatedly accused Jewish members of the Bush administration of “working for Israel” and being “card-carrying members of the Likud Party,” and asked whether “their primary allegiance was to their own country or to Israel.”
  • Daniel Levy, one of Richard Goldstone’s leading advocates in Washington.
  • Jessica Montell, executive director of B’Tselem, who says that “the situation in the West Bank is worse than apartheid in South Africa” and that Israel’s policy toward Gaza is a “siege.”
  • Naomi Chazan, a leader of the New Israel Fund and a conference honoree. Her organization funds NGO’s that accuse Israel of war crimes and Apartheid, provided the bulk of the accusations contained in the Goldstone Report, support the BDS (boycott, divestment, and sanctions) movement, and seek the end of Israel as a Jewish state.
  • Rebecca Vilkomerson, who runs the BDS group Jewish Voice for Peace. She has said, “Just as in Apartheid South Africa’s day, Israel’s society seems to be turning more bluntly racist and repressive.” She says her organization “speaks out for Goldstone, and we speak out for BDS campaigners.”
  • Debra Delee, president and CEO of the NGO Americans for Peace Now, who commented on the Turkish flotilla attack on IDF soldiers, “The root of this disaster lies not in the actions of the flotilla’s participants.”
  • Oded Na’aman, a founder of Breaking the Silence, which accuses IDF soldiers of war crimes. He says the IDF “is guilty of a wide range of abuses” including “allowing Jewish settlers to poison Palestinian wells” and evacuating entire blocks of Palestinian towns and then demolishing them. Palestinian terrorism, he says, is merely a “perceived threat.”
  • Daniel Seidemann, founder of the NGO “Terrestrial Jerusalem,” who claims that the Old City of Jerusalem is being turned into an “Evangelical settler theme park” and compared Israel’s security fence to the Berlin wall.
  • Michael Sfard, a lawyer for several radical NGO’s, who routinely demonizes Israel, accuses it of “Apartheid,” and promotes war crimes allegations against it. He testified as a paid witness on behalf of the PLO in a lawsuit brought in U.S. Federal Court by victims of terror attacks perpetrated by the Al Aksa Martyrs Brigades. He is best known as a leading advocate of “lawfare” – prosecuting Israeli soldiers and officials in European war-crimes trials.

Will you challenge those who seek to brand nearly every Israeli security measure a war crime? Will you take on the inventors and proponents of so many false claims about Israel? Will you repudiate the Goldstone Report?

The pro-Israel community – and the American people – have great respect for Israel because of her consistent willingness to seek peace with her neighbors, even as those neighbors have used the peace process as a means to continue to fight. The American people not only understand and sympathize with Israel’s security challenges, but they refuse to be taken in by cynical and fraudulent accusations that aim to make it impossible for Israel to exercise her right to self-defense. Not only do they refuse to be fooled, they admire the Jewish State for the way it has created a vibrant and prosperous democracy while being subjected to constant terrorism, hatred, and incitement.

There are few moments when someone with your experience and credibility is invited into the anti-Israel echo chamber and provided an opportunity to dispel myths, combat falsehoods, deliver much-needed moral clarity – and state clearly that the United States stands with Israel. I trust that you will seize this moment to explain why the Jewish State is not just one of our closest allies, but a country that fully deserves the admiration and moral support of all Americans.

Yours sincerely,

Noah Pollak
Executive Director, Emergency Committee for Israel

Read the full story »

ECI Letter to Senators Schumer and Levin

Below is the letter sent by the directors of the Emergency Committee for Israel to Senators Charles Schumer and Carl Levin regarding their public call for AIPAC to support the New START treaty.

December 1, 2010

The Honorable Charles Schumer
313 Hart Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510

The Honorable Carl Levin
269 Russell Office Building
Washington, DC 20510

Dear Senators Schumer and Levin:

We write in response to your remarkable public letter to Howard Kohr, the Executive Director of AIPAC. His ongoing institutional responsibilities will probably prevent him from responding to you—two powerful Senators unafraid to use your power—as frankly as we can. But we will be frank.

Your letter—an effort to pressure an organization to lobby on a matter far outside its expertise and area of concern—is a disgrace. We’ve rarely seen Senators stoop to this kind of public bullying. AIPAC “cannot afford to stand on the sidelines?” What threat do you mean to convey by this statement?

It’s clear that defenders of the New START treaty (on which, needless to say, the Emergency Committee for Israel takes no position) are frantic to have it ratified in the lame duck session, and they apparently lack the votes to ram it through. But your desperation about New START does not justify behavior unworthy of Senators.

Furthermore: Is it your position that if the Senate does not ratify START in the lame duck session, Russia will be justified in violating UN sanctions against Iran, or in selling Iran air defense missiles? If not, why do you appear to give the Russian government such a justification? Is that the action of true friends of Israel, or true opponents of a nuclear Iran?

We urge you to withdraw the letter to which you have so unfortunately lent your name.

As ever,

William Kristol, Chairman
Rachel Abrams
Gary Bauer

Directors, Emergency Committee for Israel

Read the full story »

Group’s new PAC targets candidates as ‘anti-Israel’

The Washington Jewish Week

By Adam Kredo

If the Emergency Committee for Israel’s aggressive political tactics are unsettling to some Democrats, maybe it’s because “they know they’ve been caught doing something the American people don’t want them to do,” said Noah Pollak, ECI’s executive director.

In the past few months, ECI has made a name for itself by assaulting Democrats in hotly contested congressional races over their support for Israel — or lack thereof, as ECI sees it.

Seeking to strengthen its fiscal prowess, ECI recently established an independent expenditure committee, ECI PAC, a so-called “super PAC” that is permitted to solicit and spend unlimited amounts of money on issue advocacy campaigns, so long as it doesn’t contribute funds to any particular campaign or candidate. (The group did not provide its contributions, nor total advertising expenditures, saying it preferred waiting until its documents were made public by the Federal Election Commission.)

Read the full story »

Column One: Obama and the US-Israel alliance

The Jerusalem Post

By Caroline Glick

If Netanyahu wishes to secure Israel’s alliance with the US, he should do what is best for Israel, not what is best for Israel’s Left.

Read the full story »

ECI poll shows that Israel is an important issue to American voters

With key US midterm elections less than a month away, a poll published Friday by the Emergency Committee for Israel showed that some 53 percent of the US public would be more likely to vote for a candidate perceived as pro-Israel, with 24% saying they would be less likely to vote for such a candidate.

Likewise, according to the poll, some 54% of the public said that even if they agreed with a candidate on “most other issues,” they could not vote for the candidate if he were “anti-Israel,” while 31% said they could do so.

Read the full story »

Washington Jewish Week: J Street treads on partisan territory as it attacks new pro-Israel group as out of step

by Adam Kredo

J Street – the self-professed “pro-Israel, pro-peace” group – appears to have waded further into domestic waters in recent weeks with the launch of a website assailing “neoconservatives and far-right evangelical Christians” for purporting to speak on behalf of the Jewish community.

The site has drawn both praise and criticism from pro-Israel players on both sides of partisan aisle.

For weeks, J Street has been locked in a political boxing match with the recently formed Emergency Committee for Israel, a pro-Israel outfit formed several months ago by William Kristol, a prominent Jewish neoconservative, and Gary Bauer, an evangelical Christian.

ECI has been attacking J Street-backed Democratic candidates in Pennsylvania and New Jersey in a slew of political attack ads that portray the politicians – and by proxy, J Street – as openly hostile to Israel.

Read the full story »

ECI Answers J Street’s Questions

Always happy to guide the perplexed, Michael Goldfarb, spokesman for the Emergency Committee for Israel, answers J Street’s questions:

Question: “ECI refuses to take a position on the two-state solution. But two-thirds of Israelis and American Jews support it. The last four prime ministers of Israel have. Will ECI stop hiding its true colors on the only possible way to achieve real peace and security for Israel as a Jewish, democratic homeland?”

Answer: ECI supports a two-state solution if Israel has defensible borders and if the Palestinian state is stable, peace-loving, and anti-terrorist. ECI does not support a “two-state solution” if one of the states is to be a terrorist state or is going to use its new status as a means to continue the conflict. And, yes, ECI believes there can be peace and security for Israel without having yet achieved a two-state solution.

Question: “Does [ECI] support the new peace talks starting this week, built on the notion that it should be possible to achieve a negotiated resolution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict?”

Answer: Yes.

Question: “Do they support the governments of Israel and of the United States in doing what they can to make them successful?”

Answer: Yes, if “success” means real peace and security. No, if “success” means the Obama administration pressuring Israel to make concessions that would strengthen anti-Israel extremists, weaken Israel’s security, decrease the chances of real peace, and lead to a terrorist state on Israel’s borders.

In the interest of fairness, here are two simple questions for J Street: Does J Street support a two-state solution no matter what the character and borders of both states? And does J Street support peace and security for Israel in the absence of a Palestinian state?

Read the full story »

Chuck Hagel Endorses Joe Sestak

Why would Chuck Hagel, a former Republican Senator from Nebraska, endorse Joe Sestak, a Democratic candidate for Senate in Pennsylvania?

They both share one thing in common: a record on Israel that is deeply troubling to anyone who cares about a strong U.S.-Israel relationship and the clarity of American leadership in the Middle East.

Chuck Hagel’s record in the Senate is unique in its hostility to Israel. He repeatedly refused to join large majorities in supporting Israel’s right of self-defense and he repeatedly obstructed efforts to sanction Iran and hold terrorist groups, such as Hezbollah, accountable. Hagel’s record on Israel is so poor that the Republican Jewish Coalition refused to support his campaign and the National Jewish Democratic Council publicly warned the Obama administration that it may criticize any attempt to appoint Hagel to a policy or leadership position in government.

There is another commonality between the two men: they are both admired by the anti-Israel group CAIR. Sestak headlined a CAIR fundraiser in 2007. The year before, CAIR lavishly praised Senator Hagel, saying: “Potential presidential candidates for 2008, like Hillary Clinton, John McCain, Joe Biden and Newt Gingrich, were falling all over themselves to express their support for Israel. The only exception to that rule was Senator Chuck Hagel.”

Today’s endorsement of Joe Sestak by one of the leading anti-Israel politicians in the United States again exposes the danger a Senator Sestak would pose to the U.S.-Israel alliance. He claims to be pro-Israel, but his actions – whether fundraising for CAIR, or signing a letter that criticizes Israel for defending herself from Hamas, or seeking the endorsement of a former Senator who is notorious for his hostility to Israel – tells voters all they need to know about the kind of Senator Joe Sestak would be.

See video below of Joe Sestak explaining that Chuck Hagel is “the guy I most admired in the Senate.”

Read the full story »

Rauf’s Double Standard on Terror

How do you know someone really isn’t a “moderate” on the question of Islamic radicalism? When he endorses a double standard for terrorism — appearing to condemn it when it is directed against Americans, refusing to condemn it when directed against Israelis.

Feisal Abdul Rauf, a self-styled champion of moderate Islam, was recently asked whether he thinks Hamas is a terrorist organization. “The issue of terrorism is a very complex question,” he replied. When pressed, he insisted that “I will not allow anybody to put me in a position where I am seen by any party in the world as an adversary or as an enemy.”

But surely there should be no middle ground when it comes to Hamas, just as there can be no middle ground when it comes to Al-Qaeda.

Hamas is an Islamic supremacist group that has murdered dozens of Americans and hundreds of Israelis. Hamas leaders routinely call for genocide against Jews, refer to them as vermin and bacteria, and broadcast TV shows teaching their children that their highest ambition should be the slaughter of infidels. On September 11th, 2001, as Americans recoiled in horror at the murder of thousands, members of Hamas were throwing candy in the streets of Gaza and the West Bank to celebrate.

In light of this, it is especially worrisome that the State Department continues to employ Mr. Rauf as an emissary to the Middle East. State Department spokesman P.J. Crowley calls him “a distinguished Muslim cleric,” and says, “His work on tolerance and religious diversity is well known, and he brings a moderate perspective to foreign audiences on what it’s like to be a practicing Muslim in the United States.”

The employment of Mr. Rauf by the State Department lends American credibility to a disturbing trend in the West: the idea that terrorism against Israelis falls into a different and less objectionable category from terrorism against other people. This may be fashionable in Europe, but the United States does not embrace an Israel exception to the unacceptability of suicide bombings.

One of the most important messages the United States can deliver to the Middle East is that there is never a justification for jihadist murder, whether in New York, Madrid, London — or Tel Aviv. It is clear from Mr. Rauf’s statements that when he travels abroad at U.S. taxpayers’ expense he is not delivering this message.

There are numerous Muslim leaders in America who are willing to speak the plain truth about Hamas. If the Obama administration and the State Department wish to deliver a clear and compelling message about American values to the Middle East, they can start by disassociating from Feisal Abdul Rauf.

– Noah Pollak

Read the full story »

The Washington Post reports on ECI’s Jim Himes Ad

The Washington Post

By Greg Sargent

Bill Kristol’s hawkish, pro-Israel group, which has been running ads blasting Dems as anti-Israel, is now making it explicit: It is targeting Dems with paid media for the express purpose of making it politically toxic for them to criticize Israel.

That’s what Kristol and a spokesman for his group, the Emergency Committee for Israel, suggested to me today, in statements accompanying a new ad it’s set to release attacking Dem Rep Jim Himes of Connecticut.

“You can’t just say you’re pro-Israel, you have to be pro-Israel,” Kristol said. The ad blasts Himes for signing a recent letter that allegedly accused Israel of “collective punishment” for enforcing the Gaza blockade.

Read the full story »

Politico reports on ECI’s new Nye Ad

Politico

By Ben Stein

The hawkish Emergency Committee for Israel is targeting two more imperiled House Democrats , Virginia’s Glenn Nye and Connecticut’s Jim Himes, with ads attacking them for signing a letter pressing Israel to ease conditions for civilians in Gaza and warning it to avoid “collective punishment.”

The ad, a version of which already aired against Ohio Rep. Mary Jo Kilroy [who rather emphatically rejected its charges], notes that most House Democrats wouldn’t sign what it calls “anti-Israel letter” and suggests viewers ask the members why they “joined an assault on Israel.”

Read the full story »